Indianapolis - A man was taken to the hospital in critical condition Friday night after police stunned him with a Taser.
Officers responded to a call of a disturbance at the O'Charley's restaurant at 5130 West 38th Street around 10:45 p.m. Police say there were reports of a man threatening patrons with a gun inside the restaurant. When officers arrived, the man's friend, identified as 35-year-old Henry Bryant, became physically involved with the officers, forcing officers to pull their Taser guns.
After presumably giving all warnings to Bryant, an officer fired a Taser at him. After securing Bryant, officers noticed he was having difficulty breathing and called for medics and administered CPR while waiting for an ambulance to arrive.
"The officers participate in this training to carry the weapon and they feel the effects of this weapon," said IMPD Sgt. Paul Thompson. "So, for us to use this on our own people as a part of training, we're pretty confident that it's a safe weapon. This is just a very unusual circumstance."
Bryant was transported to Methodist Hospital in critical condition, where he died a short time later. Police are investigating the incident and have not decided if the officer that fired the Taser will be placed on administrative duty.
Another article, from United Press International, [Man dies after being stunned with Taser] which [erroneously?] says Bryant died at the restaurant. It also has a typo ['mad vs man'] but does say that Bryant had a weapons permit. It also says he was arrested for public intoxication, indicating to me that if true the guy was just getting carried away at O'Charleys.
However, neither article expresses whether there was an actual gun involved or to the extent of his alleged threats.
Something was lacking, to me, in both articles. Was he just drunk, having dinner with his friends or drinks at the bar and getting carried away? And was it Bryant 'threatening with a gun', as the second link says or was it Bryant's friend who was threatening patrons as the seed suggests?
This seed says the man threatening the gun was a different man than Bryant; that Bryant was the friend.
Police say there were reports of a man threatening patrons with a gun inside the restaurant. When officers arrived, the man's friend, identified as 35-year-old Henry Bryant, became physically involved with the officers, forcing officers to pull their Taser guns.
The other article says...
Officers responded to the restaurant to investigate a report of a man with a gun. Police said they determined the mad had a firearms permit, the newspaper reported.
However, the man reportedly started fighting with officers, who used a Taser on him and arrested him for public intoxication.
I do not mean to be critical but something is sloppy and many elements are missing or not lining up.
Too many variables to call a conclusive decision, but still.
Police seem to just be pussying around now. If they would have acted quickly, they probably could have done it old-style and subdued the man by reasonable force, rather than electrocuting him to death.
Humans are lazy at heart. If we're given the method to be lazy, we'll use that method.
Tazers are that method.
"So, for us to use this on our own people as a part of training, we're pretty confident that it's a safe weapon. This is just a very unusual circumstance."
typical police cya
I have Google Alerts set up for Taser stories and on this one story, it came back with 13 different articles about the same story, every one of them were just a little different also. All were lacking alot of details and left many questions.
Well not really "my version"....you know...the newspaper..:-)
The question is ceasing to be whether the weapon was used appropriately and is starting to be "should police be allowed to use a lethal weapon." Seriously. Anyone have statistics on deaths from other "non-lethal" forms of reducing a citizen to compliance? There have always been deaths . . . men who smothered against car seats because they move their faces away, accidental concussions from beating, etc. Per use, is the Taser more fatal?
I don't have that answer, but there is a woman, I think her name is Katy that visits almost all my Taser articles that some dies in, they all have "taser-death" as a tag, she has tons of data on various death rates, I think she is doing some kind of study. My guess is she either has it or could find it.
As far as a Taser, it is a less than lethal devise. An ink pen can be called non-lethal and yet I can stab someone with it and it becomes a lethal instrument. Also, a Taser X-26 (what IMPD carries) gives a jolt of 0.07 joules. A defib machine delivers 150 joules to shock a persons heart into a rhythm. This is not even 1 tenth of 1 joule. I have personally be shot twice with the Taser X-26 and have received numerous drive-stuns with out the cartridge on the end of the device, I am still alive and kicking. After almost 300,000 people that have been shot with a taser, the ones that die you need to read the autopsy report very carefully. Just for further information, at the last Master Taser conference, an instructor was shot with a Taser X-26 and received a shock for 44 seconds and live to tell the story. Please know the difference between a "stun" gun and a Taser X-26 electronic control device. If it was a "lethal" weapon, I should be dead.
As far as the Officers having to use this device, in the State of Indiana, it is a misdemeanor to resist an Officer with force. If he feels that the arrest is not lawful, then go through the system and sue. That is why we have the court system. No one should be beat old school. That is why Police train as much as possible. We are in a post Rodney King era and everyone has a video camera and all Police Departments will fire an Officer if he tries this. I feel that no one should have an electronic control device or chemical agents used against them but sometimes there are no choices.
If this was a perfect world I would be out of a job. 11 year Officer.
TROLL ALERT. SEE THE SOCKPUPPET!!
Trouble with the "non-lethal' concept is why then over 300 deaths by Taser in the USA ?
And while the low selling X-26 does have a .07 joule rating, the far more popular M-26 has a 1.76 joule output. That is rather a big jump. And Tasers are highly complex CPU controlled devices that do fail. Hopefully not providing too much voltage or currant.
However when a person is dealing with a another that has a weakened heart, a recent neurosurgery a artificial electronic implant, a history of seizures or mental illness you have just opened up a huge area that Taser International cannot prove to understand. The sharpest minds at NIH and Mayo clinic are looking at that. that is a vast area that is a very risky area.
If he feels that the arrest is not lawful, then go through the system and sue.
Not if he's dead.
That is why Police train as much as possible.
The amount and quality of that training in regard to tasers is very much under question. As well as the amt. of training received in evaluating the physical state of the victim.
We are in a post Rodney King era and everyone has a video camera and all Police Departments will fire an Officer if he tries this.
That particular assertion is very much in doubt.
11 year Officer.
How many unarmed people have you tased?
You're a sockpuppet or a tool as far as I can see. Come a little farther out of the shadows.
what is a sockpuppet that Gwenny is asking me to see? i know the definition of sockpuppet and i certainly know troll but am i missing something?
The original commenters "Newsvine name?" Is that what's giving him away as above terms?
Taser Instructor is a brand new account with only a comment in this thread. It was created, in likelihood, but someone we have already discredited.
Taser Instructor is a brand new account with only a comment in this thread. It was created, in likelihood, but someone we have already discredited.
I see. Thanks.
One cannot sue a governmental agency as easily as the 'instructor' suggests.
Yeah...Try to get a civil case of a taser injury against a Government Agency held at the Supreme Court ? I have a feeling that those chances are rather slim, you would die of old age first. Or of filing out the correct forms to even start the correct motions.
There are people here saying a taser is a non lethal weapon and I guess it can be if you live through being tasered but if after being tasered, you end up dead, I don't think you can call the weapon non lethal, not to mention that the young man was reportedly shot with tear gas as well as being tasered and wrestled. I've seen those police officer test where they stand there 15 minutes getting ready and then somebody touches them for about a second with a taser, thats bullcrap. Let me and two of my partners test you "taser instructor". We'll hit you in the face with about a half can of CS gas, give you about 40 or 50 seconds of juice from the taser while delivering blows to your head and weight to your chest. I'll bet a weeks pay you won't make it. I'll give you a weeks pay just for the pleasure of testing you.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |